Michael W. Rogers v. Unitrin Auto

05-2102Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2102
MICHAEL W. ROGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
REBA L. ROGERS,
Plaintiff,
versus
UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a
Kemper Auto and Home; AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; LUMBERMENS MUTUAL
CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Carl Horn, III,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-41-5)
Submitted: March 15, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael W. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Tracy Lynn Eggleston, Garrett
John McAvoy, COZEN O’CONNOR, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

*The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael W. Rogers appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in his breach of contract
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.*
See Rogers v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co., No. CA-04-41-5
(W.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.