Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-2079•Joseph N. Briggs v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, Police Department
05-2079Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.03.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2079
JOSEPH N. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, Police Department; BUNCOME
COUNTY SHERIFF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-05-73-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph N. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis W. Euler, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina; Julie M. Kepple,
BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph N. Briggs appeals the district court’s order
denying his Motion for Final Execution and Order to Preclude Exempt
Property Rights. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Briggs v. City of Asheville, No. CA-05-73-
1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.