Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-2042•Gary D. Bean v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated
05-2042Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit14.06.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2042
GARY D. BEAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
04-2213-DKC)
Submitted: May 9, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Branch, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Emmett F. McGee,
Jr., Paul A. Mallos, DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US, L.L.P.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary D. Bean appeals a district court order granting summary
judgment against him in his employment discrimination action
against United Parcel Service, Incorporated. Finding no error, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.