Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-2023•Rita Nadine Rubendall v. TOMMY G. THOMPSON, Secretary, Department of Health
05-2023Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.02.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2023
RITA NADINE RUBENDALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOMMY G. THOMPSON, Secretary, Department of
Health and Human Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
04-2554-8-PJM)
Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: February 16, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rita Nadine Rubendall, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Ray White, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Rita Nadine Rubendall appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of her employer in her civil
action alleging claims of employment discrimination under Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Rubendall v. Thompson, No. CA-04-2554-
8-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.