Titilola Kelly v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 setting forth standard of review . Accordingly,…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1961
TITILOLA KELLY,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A73-189-898)
Submitted: January 24, 2007 Decided: February 8, 2007
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kayode Oladele, THE JUSTICE CENTER, Detroit, Michigan, for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Mark L. Gross, David White, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Titilola Kelly, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying as untimely her motion to reopen
immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)
(2006) (establishing a ninety-day time limitation for filing a
motion to reopen); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992)
(setting forth standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kelly, No. A73-189-898
(B.I.A. Aug. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --