Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-1838•In re: Otto Claude Smith; Linda C. Smith
05-1838Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.12.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1838
In Re: OTTO CLAUDE SMITH; LINDA C. SMITH,
Debtors.
------------------------------------------
OTTO CLAUSE SMITH; LINDA C. SMITH,
Debtors - Appellants,
versus
CROWFIELDS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
Creditor - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-05-80-1; BK-03-11127)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Otto Claude Smith and Linda C. Smith, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas
James Tate, MCGUIRE, WOOD & BISSETTE, PA, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Otto Claude Smith and Linda C. Smith appeal from the
district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of
the district court’s order dismissing as untimely their appeal from
the bankruptcy court’s order. Our review of the record and the
opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v.
Crowfields, Nos. CA-05-80-1; BK-03-11127 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.