Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-1716•Michael L. Lee v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass, d/b/a PPG, Incorporated
05-1716Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.12.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1716
MICHAEL L. LEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS, d/b/a PPG,
Incorporated,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-04-4-5)
Submitted: November 21, 2005 Decided: December 12, 2005
Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael L. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. John Raymond Merinar, Jr.,
STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Lee appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination, in
violation of the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va. Code
§ 5-11-1, et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Lee v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass, d/b/a PPG, Inc., No.
CA-04-4-5 (N.D. W. Va. May 25, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.