Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-1510•Poopak Ta’ati v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College
05-1510Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.03.2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1510
POOPAK TA’ATI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03-
2097-RWT; CA-04-3799-RWT)
Submitted: March 3, 2006 Decided: March 20, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Poopak Ta’ati, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Veronica Burrell, Joann
Robertson, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Poopak Ta’ati appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the Defendant on her employment discrimination
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court in the bench hearing of April 18, 2005. See
Ta’ati v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Nos.
CA-03-2097-RWT; CA-04-3799-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.