Cindy Nelson v. Armfield Wong

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1502
CINDY NELSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARMFIELD WONG; VALERIE ZUCKERMAN; JANET
DEMARZO; GEORGE PATAKI; DUDLEY LEHMAN; DAVID
FREUNDLICH; JORDAN TRAGER; HEATHER NORTON;
PHEON BEAL; MIKE EASLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-307-5-F)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cindy Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Michael Gatto, SUFFOLK
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAW, Hauppauge, New York; Joseph C. Moore,
III, ALLEN & MOORE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Peter H. Schiff, NEW
YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Albany, New York; W. A.
Holland, Jr., Smithfield, North Carolina; J. Mark Payne, JOHNSTON
COUNTY ATTORNEY, Smithfield, North Carolina; Chris Zucco Sinha,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Cindy Nelson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action seeking review of state court
judgments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Nelson v. Wong, No. CA-04-307-5-F (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --