Edgar M. Porter v. Montgomery County Government

05-1424Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.08.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1424
EDGAR M. PORTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT; MONTGOMERY
COUNTY HOUSING OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION;
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL; THE CIRCUIT
COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
05-75-DKC)
Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar M. Porter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edgar M. Porter appeals a district court order dismissing
without prejudice his civil rights complaint. The district court
dismissed the amended supplemental complaint because Porter only
made general, non-fact-specific allegations of racial bias. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm
for the reasons cited by the district court. See Porter v.
Montgomery County, No. CA-05-75-DKC (D. Md. filed Mar. 15, 2005;
entered Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.