Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-1373•Lucho Humberto Youngs v. Edward Reilly
05-1373Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.08.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1373
LUCHO HUMBERTO YOUNGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDWARD REILLY; JOANN L. KELLY; ANNAMARIA HAJ;
EDWARD ALLEN; DOMINIC PITTELO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-04-1112-1)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 1, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lucho Humberto Youngs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lucho Humberto Youngs, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order dismissing as moot his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). Because Youngs failed to challenge on
appeal the ground on which the district relied to dismiss the
petition, he has waived appellate review of that issue. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues
raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny
Youngs’ motions for appointment of counsel and for production of
documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.