In re: Janise Rose Sweatmon

05-1322Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.09.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1322
In Re: JANISE ROSE SWEATMON,
Debtor.
-----------------------------
JANISE ROSE SWEATMON,
Debtor - Appellant,
versus
OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NANCY L. SPENCER-GRIGSBY,
Trustee.
No. 05-1323
In Re: JANISE ROSE SWEATMON,
Debtor.
-----------------------------
JANISE ROSE SWEATMON,
Debtor - Appellant,
versus

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NANCY L. SPENCER-GRIGSBY,
Trustee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
05-264-PJM; CA-05-265-PJM; BK-04-24686)
Submitted: August 31, 2005 Decided: September 20, 2005
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janise Rose Sweatmon, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Scott Bernstein,
MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Rockville, Maryland; Lisa-Gail Kingsley
Jenkins, HUESMAN, JONES & MILES, LLC, Hunt Valley, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Janise Rose Sweatmon appeals the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) denying her request
for a continuance; (2) lifting the automatic stay and allowing a
foreclosure to proceed; and (3) dismissing her bankruptcy petition
with prejudice. Our review of the record and the opinions below
discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See In re Sweatmon, Nos. CA-
05-264-PJM; CA-05-265-PJM; BK-04-24686 (D. Md. filed Mar. 17,
2005 & entered Mar. 18, 2005). We grant Sweatmon’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis, deny her motion for appointment of
counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.