Emilia T. Tabe v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 . Accordingly, we deny the

05-1158Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.10.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1158
EMILIA T. TABE,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A75-362-125)
Submitted: September 9, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005
Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Paul J.
McNulty, United States Attorney, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United
States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Emilia T. Tabe, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review from an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s
order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have
reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find
that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty,
502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.