Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
05-1049•Victor Hayes v. ELAINE CHAO, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
05-1049Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.03.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1049
VICTOR HAYES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELAINE CHAO, Secretary, United States
Department of Labor,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03-
3591-RWT)
Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Sendek Smith, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Victor Hayes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Chao, No. CA-03-3591-
RWT (D. Md. filed Sept. 20, 2004 & entered Sept. 21, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.