Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-7933•Lonnie Everett v. Trooper Wilkerson
04-7933Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.05.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7933
LONNIE EVERETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TROOPER WILKERSON; TROOPER BRANCH; I. GRAHAM
PRUITT, Magistrate at Pitt County Detention
Center; STACEY A. PHIPPS, Associate Attorney
General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-569-5-4)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lonnie Everett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lonnie Everett appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as time-barred his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2000). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Everett v. Wilkerson, No. CA-04-569-5-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.