Wade Stephney v. SEASIDE TRUCK, Auto Sales & Auto Salesmen

04-7800Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.01.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7800
WADE STEPHNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SEASIDE TRUCK, Auto Sales & Auto Salesmen;
BOBBY SANDERS; RONNIE SANDERS; T. J. HARRIS;
HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CRYSTAL BURKE;
NORTH BEACH CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHIL
WEBSTER, Lieutenant; JOEL MCGARTLIN; J. W.
MILLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-1381-4-27BH)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wade Stephney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wade Stephney appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stephney v.
Seaside Truck, No. CA-04-1381-4-27BH (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2004). We
deny Stephney’s “Notice and Motion for Continue to Amended
Additional Defendant,” and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.