Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-7724•Charles Jones, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, a/k/a Jeffrey Victor Warner v. Court of Appeals
04-7724Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.12.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7724
CHARLES JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones,
a/k/a Jeffrey Victor Warner,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COURT OF APPEALS; GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
MARYLAND; MARVIN B. STEINBERG, Maryland State
Judge; ARRIE W. DAVIS, Maryland State Judge;
DIANE ELIZABETH KELLER, Assistant Attorney
General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
04-3153-RDB)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Court
of Appeals, No. CA-04-3153-RDB (D. Md. filed Oct. 7, 2004; entered
Oct. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.