United States of America v. Sammy Chavis

04-7543Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.01.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7543
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SAMMY CHAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-95-33)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 20, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sammy Chavis, Appellant Pro Se. Kristopher Todd Hagins, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sammy Chavis appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to compel the Government to move for a downward
departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Chavis, No. CR-95-33 (D.S.C.
Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.