Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-7286•Roger Byrd v. United States of America
04-7286Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.10.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7286
ROGER BYRD; HERMAN JUNIOR BYRD,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-04-77)
Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 15, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Byrd, Herman Junior Byrd, Appellants Pro Se. Gretchen C. F.
Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Roger Byrd and Herman Junior Byrd appeal the district
court’s order denying their motions for judicial notice and to join
the defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Byrd v. United States, No. CA-04-77 (W.D.N.C.
July 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.