Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-7144•Danny Hoskin v. Helen F. Fahey
04-7144Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.10.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7144
DANNY HOSKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HELEN F. FAHEY; DAVID N. HARKER; CAROL ANN
SIEVERS; HERBERT COULTON; MICHAEL M. HAWES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-192)
Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 15, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Hoskin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Danny Hoskin appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his
motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Hoskin v. Fahey, No. CA-04-192 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7,
2004 & entered Apr. 12, 2004; filed June 22, 2004 & entered
June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.