Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

04-6989Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.10.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6989
MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward
Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER;
THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Former Warden; SEWALL
SMITH, Warden; AHAMEFULE GRANT EMEZUE,
Corporal,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MESSINGLY, Corporalm 3 to 11 shift,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-03-595-WDQ)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Corr. Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-03-
595-WDQ (D. Md. May 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.