Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6898•Learie A. Daly v. St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office
04-6898Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.09.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6898
LEARIE A. DALY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ST. MARY’S COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; ST. MARY’S
COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; TIMOTHY K. CAMERON,
Lieutenant Commander; DEBORAH L. DIEDRICH,
Lieutenant Assistant; MANAGER, ARAMARK FOOD
CATERING SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
2352-AMD)
Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: September 16, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Learie A. Daly, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., LOCAL
GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Learie A. Daly appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Daly v. St.
Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office, No. CA-03-2352-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 30,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.