Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6817•Dennis Gene Pauley v. Loretta Simmons Gandee
04-6817Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.01.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6817
DENNIS GENE PAULEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LORETTA SIMMONS GANDEE; KEVIN WAYNE GANDEE;
MICHAEL CLIFFORD, Prosecutor; DAVID L. TUCKER,
Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-04-152-2)
Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: January 3, 2005
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Gene Pauley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Gene Pauley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pauley v.
Gandee, No. CA-04-152-2 (S.D.W. Va. May 4, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.