Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6629•Saleem Rafeeq Porter v. JEFFREY W. FRAZIER, CJM, Superintendent
04-6629Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.08.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6629
SALEEM RAFEEQ PORTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFFREY W. FRAZIER, CJM, Superintendent; TED
HULL, Major, CJM, Assistant Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-03-249-AM)
Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Saleem Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, THOMPSON &
MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Saleem Rafeeq Porter appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Porter v.
Frazier, No. CA-03-249-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 15, 2004 & entered
Mar. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.