Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6604•Perry E. Thornley, Jr v. RUFFUS FLEMMING, Regional Director
04-6604Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.05.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6604
PERRY E. THORNLEY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RUFFUS FLEMMING, Regional Director; HINCKLE,
Chief Warden GRCC; DUGGER, Corporal,
Corrections Officer, GRCC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-03-419-3)
Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 20, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry E. Thornley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Perry E. Thornley, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. See Thornley v. Flemming, No. CA-03-419-3 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.