Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6573•Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration
04-6573Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.10.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6573
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
(INS),
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-1507-AM)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. William Joseph Howard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals from the district court’s
orders denying his petition for writ of mandamus and denying his
motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v.
United States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-02-1507-AM (E.D. Va. filed
July 16, 2003 & entered July 17, 2003; Feb. 23, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.