Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6347•Levi Luginbyhl v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, Unknown Members
04-6347Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.10.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6347
LEVI LUGINBYHL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, Unknown
Members, et al.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-03-3364-AW)
Submitted: June 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Levi Luginbyhl, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Levi Luginbyhl appeals the denial of his motion for
reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Luginbyhl v. American Correctional Ass’n., No. CA-03-
3364-AW (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2004). Further, we deny Luginbyhl’s
motion for emergency injunction because he did not first present
that motion to the district court, and did not allege that it would
have been impracticable to do so. See Fed. R. App. P.
8(a)(2)(A)(i). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.