Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6193•United States of America v. Danah D. Diggs
04-6193Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.03.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6193
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANAH D. DIGGS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 04-6259
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANAH D. DIGGS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon; Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-01-2)
Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danah D. Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Lucas Hobbs, Assistant
United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia; Eric Matthew Hurt,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Danah D. Diggs appeals the district court’s orders
denying her motion for a downward departure and motion to correct
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Diggs, No. CR-01-02 (W.D. Va.
Nov. 14, 2003; Jan. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.