United States of America v. Barry Earl Williams

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6048
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BARRY EARL WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-101)
Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 5, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, Assistant
United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Barry Earl Williams appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his motion filed pursuant to Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.
Hartford-Empire Co. 322 U.S. 238 (1944). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Williams, No. CR-95-101 (E.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --