United States of America v. Richard Enriquez

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD ENRIQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-97-173-MU)
Submitted: July 30, 2004 Decided: August 16, 2004
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Enriquez, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Scott Broyles,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*Contrary to the government’s assertion, Enriquez timely filed
his notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), 26(a)(2).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Richard Enriquez appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to clarify the court’s intention as to
the concurrent nature of his sentence. * We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Enriquez, No. CR-97-173-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --