Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-6008•Sean McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff
04-6008Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.07.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6008
SEAN MCCALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BERKELEY COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BERKELEY COUNTY
DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-02-2448-2-18)
Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean McCall, Appellant Pro Se. James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Alexia
Pittas-Giroux, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sean McCall appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and related state tort claims. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See McCall v. Berkeley County Sheriff, No. CA-02-2448-2-18
(D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.