Reginald D. Evans v. Time Warner Cable, Incorporated

04-2498Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.05.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2498
REGINALD D. EVANS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TIME WARNER CABLE, INCORPORATED; TIME WARNER
CABLE, South Carolina Division,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-1003-3-17BC)
Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 16, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Rogers Ellerbe, III,
ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his complaint pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 532 (2000) for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Evans v. Time Warner Cable, No.
CA-04-1003-3-17BC (D.S.C. filed Nov. 4, 2004 & entered Nov. 5,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.