Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-2495•Alfred B. Goodwein v. Harold Fitrer, in his capacity as Chief of Staff/Executive Director of Human Resources
04-2495Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.05.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2495
ALFRED B. GOODWEIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HAROLD FITRER, in his capacity as Chief of
Staff/Executive Director of Human Resources;
DEBORAH JEWELL-SHERMAN, in her capacity as
Superintendent of Richmond Public Schools;
LARRY A. OLANREWAJU; CHARLES N. NANCE; DAVID
J. BALLARD; JOAN T. MIMMS; EUGENE A. MASON,
JR.; M. GAIL TOWNES; CAROL A.O. WOLF; R. M.
MALONE; STEPHEN N. JOHNSON, in their nine
respective capacities as members of the
Richmond School Board; RICHMOND SCHOOL BOARD;
MELVIN L. ROSE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-202-3)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 3, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Alfred B. Goodwein, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Ploszay Karn,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Alfred B. Goodwein appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Goodwein v. Fitrer, No. CA-04-202-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.