United States of America v. Maria S. Cruz

04-2494Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.07.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2494
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARIA S. CRUZ; VANESSA LOZANO; YVONNE LOZANO,
Claimants - Appellants,
and
PROPERTY, 3714 CANCUN LOOP, WEBB COUNTY,
LAREDO, TEXAS, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND
IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,
Defendant,
JOSE ANTONIO LOZANO; HILL TOP FARM, LIMITED, a
Texas Limited Partnership,
Claimants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-98-11)
Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: July 12, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maria S. Cruz, Vanessa Lozano, Yvonne Lozano, Appellants Pro Se.
Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s orders denying
their motions to set aside the judgment of forfeiture regarding
their home and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Cruz,
No. CA-98-11 (M.D.N.C. filed Sept. 8, 2004 & entered Sept. 9, 2004
& Jan. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.