Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-2477•Gene M. Munson v. DONALD L. EVANS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce
04-2477Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2477
GENE M. MUNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD L. EVANS, Secretary, U.S. Department of
Commerce; UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-04-181)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gene M. Munson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, Rachel Celia
Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gene M. Munson appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees in his
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Munson v. Evans, No. CA-04-181 (E.D.
Va. Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.