Christopher Simmler v. Eckerd Corporation

04-2359Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.05.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2359
CHRISTOPHER SIMMLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ECKERD CORPORATION; MICHAEL A. PARRISH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ALLEN QUESTROM, CEO; LUISA HOLLINGSWORTH;
ROBIN PARRISH; BRENDEN O’HARA; BUTNER
CREEDMOOR FAMILY PRACTICE; ROBERT JUER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-279-5-BR)
Submitted: April 22, 2005 Decided: May 4, 2005
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Simmler, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Harrison Johnson,
POYNER & SPRUILL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Simmler appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging
wrongful discharge and assault and battery. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Simmler v. Eckerd
Corp., No. CA-03-279-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2004 & Sept. 20,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.