Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-2289•Frances A. James v. Cp&l/progress Energy
04-2289Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.05.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2289
FRANCES A. JAMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CP&L/PROGRESS ENERGY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-02-920-H)
Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 12, 2005
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frances A. James, Appellant Pro Se. Zebulon Dyer Anderson, SMITH,
ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Frances A. James appeals the district court’s order
granting her former employer’s motion for summary judgment in her
civil action in which she alleged employment discrimination based
upon her disability and race. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See James v. CP&L/Progress Energy, No. CA-02-
920-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.