Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-2206•Donnell D. Cox, Sr v. Prince George’s County, Maryland
04-2206Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.07.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2206
DONNELL D. COX, SR.; MERCEDES T. COX, on
behalf of themselves and seven of their minor
children: S.C., D.C., R.C., V.C., M.C., D.C.
and D.C.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; JOHN S.
FARRELL; RICHARD E. WHITAKER, Detective,
Prince George's County Police; OTHER UNKNOWN
POLICE OFFICERS; B.E. TURNER, Prince George’s
County Police,
Defendants - Appellees,
----------------------------------------
DAVID MORRIS, Captain; JOHN FINNERIN,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(CA-02-1492-DKC)
Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: July 28, 2005
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Donnell D. Cox, Sr., Mercedes T. Cox, Appellants Pro Se. William
Antoine Snoddy, Associate County Attorney, Leonard L. Lucchi,
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; John Anthony
Bielee, UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Donnell Cox, Sr. and Mercedes Cox appeal the district
court’s order entering judgment after a jury returned a verdict for
defendants on the Coxes’ civil rights complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
See Cox v. Prince George’s County, No. CA-02-1492-DKC (D. Md. Aug.
19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.