Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-2196•Edward Bunn v. Arlington County
04-2196Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.02.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2196
EDWARD BUNN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARLINGTON COUNTY; RON CARLEE; AMI YORCZYK;
GREGORY GIRARDIN; MICHAEL LONGHI; FRANCES
O’LEARY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-04-628-1)
Submitted: January 10, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Bunn, Appellant Pro Se. Ara Loris Tramblian, Deputy County
Attorney, Peter Harlan Maier, Assistant County Attorney, Arlington,
Virginia; Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Edward Bunn appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Bunn v. Arlington County, No. CA-04-628-1
(E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27 & entered Aug. 30, 2004; filed Sept. 2 &
entered Sept. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.