Jackson Moore v. New Hanover County Government

04-2185Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2185
JACKSON MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEW HANOVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT; COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS; COUNTY MANAGER; HUMAN RELATIONS
COMMISSION; CARL A. BYRD; JOHN DAVIS; CYNTHIA
STEVENS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-195-DEV)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jackson Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Holt Moore, III, NEW
HANOVER COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Wilmington, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jackson Moore appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”); 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and
1985 (2000); and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. New Hanover
County Gov’t, No. CA-03-195-DEV (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.