Getachew Woldearegay v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992

04-2175Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.06.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2175
GETACHEW WOLDEAREGAY,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A70-817-716)
Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: June 22, 2005
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M.
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Bethany B. Hauser,
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Getachew Woldearegay, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an August 25, 2004 order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen
immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying the motion to reopen. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005);
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Yanez-Popp v. INS, 998
F.2d 231, 234 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.