Cindy R. Leonard v. PORTER J. GOSS, Director, Central Intelligence Agency

04-2125Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.12.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2125
CINDY R. LEONARD
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PORTER J. GOSS, Director, Central Intelligence
Agency; HEIDI F.; WILLIAM F.; DOUGLAS B.;
MARILEE J. LAYMAN; HERBERT B.; RONALD L.;
DIANE E. FLORKOWSKI; WILLIAM CRUMB; SUSAN
WATERMAN; JEANETTE MOORE; GARY C.; SHIRLEY S.;
LYNDA M.; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-1176-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 20, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cindy R. Leonard, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, William Joseph Howard, Ralph

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Andrew Price, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Cindy R. Leonard appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer in her
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Leonard v. Tenet, No. CA-03-
1176-1 (E.D. Va. June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.