Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-2120•Su Hyon Kim v. Medimmune, Incorporated
04-2120Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.02.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2120
SU HYON KIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MEDIMMUNE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
03-3149-PJM)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Su Hyon Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa Burke Wright, John Michael
Remy, Michael Nicholas Petkovich, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, Vienna,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Su Hyon Kim appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging termination
in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kim v.
MedImmune, Inc., No. CA-03-3149-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 17, 2004;
entered Aug. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.