Rajaee A. Pooler v. Supervalu Holdings, Incorporated

04-2097Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.02.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2097
RAJAEE A. POOLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-03-275-3)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005
Before WIDENER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rajaee A. Pooler, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Garrison Meyer, III,
Vijay Kumar Mago, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Rajaee A. Pooler appeals the district court’s order
adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation, and granting summary judgment in favor of
Supervalu Holdings, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Pooler v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc., No. CA-03-
275-3 (E.D. Va. July 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.