Peter C. Andresen v. Provident Bank of Maryland

04-2032Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.11.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2032
PETER C. ANDRESEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PROVIDENT BANK OF MARYLAND; GARY A. ROSEN,
Trustee;
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MARYLAND,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-03-3567-AW; BK-01-25370)
Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter C. Andresen, Appellant Pro Se. Mark S. Devan, COVAHEY,
BOOZER, DEVAN & DORE, P.A., Towson, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen,
Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Peter C. Andresen appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Andresen v. Provident Bank, No. CA-03-
3567-AW; BK-01-25370 (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004 & entered July 1,
2004; July 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.