Paule Nadege Mbonji Eding v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1997
PAULE NADEGE MBONJI EDING; ASTRID EDING,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-218-876; A95-225-199)
Submitted: April 20, 2005 Decided: May 2, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Michele Y. F.
Sarko, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sisters Paule Nadege Mbonji Eding and Astrid Eding,
natives and citizens of Cameroon, petition for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to
reopen its previous order affirming the immigration judge’s denial
of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying the Edings’ motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of
the Board. See In re: Eding, No. A95-218-876; No. A95-225-199
(B.I.A. July 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --