Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1985•Nichole Jones v. GALE A. NORTON, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior
04-1985Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1985
NICHOLE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GALE A. NORTON, Secretary, United States
Department of the Interior,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-1392-1)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan Banov, ALAN BANOV & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Steven E.
Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nichole Jones appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to defendant in Jones’ employment discrimination
suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jones v. Norton, No. CA-03-1392-1 (E.D. Va. July 22,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.