Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1972•Tucson W. Jones v. Southcorr, LLC
04-1972Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.12.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1972
TUCSON W. JONES; YVONNE C. JONES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
SOUTHCORR, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-499-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tucson W. Jones, Yvonne C. Jones, Appellants Pro Se. Hamlin Landis
Wade, Jr., Melissa Megan Kidd, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PPLC,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tucson W. Jones and Yvonne C. Jones appeal the district
court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in this Title
VII action alleging race discrimination in employment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v.
Southcorr, LLC, No. CA-03-499-1 (M.D.N.C. filed July 8, 2004;
entered July 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.