Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
04-1966•John Paul Turner v. Commissioner, No. 04- 7052 U.S.T.C. July 8, 2004 . We deny the motion to reconsider the
04-1966Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.12.2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1966
JOHN PAUL TURNER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 04-7052)
Submitted: November 29, 2004 Decided: December 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Teresa Ellen McLaughlin, Sara
Ann Ketchum, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.;
Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Paul Turner appeals from the Tax Court’s order
dismissing his petition for want of jurisdiction. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the
reasoning of the Tax Court. See Turner v. Commissioner, No. 04-
7052 (U.S.T.C. July 8, 2004). We deny the motion to reconsider the
order denying the motion for stay and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.