Susi Suprihatin; Fnu Gunawan v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 1992 . We have reviewed the evidence of record

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1841
SUSI SUPRIHATIN; FNU GUNAWAN,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-476-409; A79-476-410)
Submitted: January 31, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susi Suprihatin, Fnu Gunawan, Petitioners Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez
Wright, Larry Patrick Cote, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*Suprihatin’s application includes her husband, Fnu Gunawan.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Susi Suprihatin, * a native and citizen of Indonesia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of
her application for asylum and withholding of removal. To obtain
reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an
alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling
that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear
of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84
(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that
Suprihatin fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary
result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Suprihatin cannot
meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal.
Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-
Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --